Researchers develop scale to assess antibiotic resistance awareness among healthcare professionals – News-Medical. Net

Researchers develop scale to assess antibiotic resistance awareness among healthcare professionals – News-Medical. Net

In a recent study published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy , researchers developed an antibiotic resistance (ABR) awareness level to evaluate ABR awareness among human healthcare experts (HHCPs) and animal healthcare professionals (AHCPs).

Study: Awareness of antibiotic resistance: a tool for measurement among human and animal health care professionals in LMICs and UMICs. Image Credit: Fahroni/Shutterstock
Study: Awareness associated with antibiotic level of resistance: a tool for measurement amongst human plus animal health care specialists in LMICs and UMICs . Image Credit: Fahroni/Shutterstock


ABR poses a great threat to population wellness worldwide, and methods for reliable tools assessing ABR awareness are needed with regard to guiding plus evaluating health interventions. Psychometry specialists have devised methods to develop and validate scales regarding objective measurements of knowledge, abilities, and skills plus subjective dimensions of values, attitudes, and interests of individuals.

The procedures intended for developing plus validating the measurement strategies involve the development of items (identification of domains and the particular generation associated with items), development of size ( the identification of constructs, pretesting of questions, and the particular extraction associated with factors), and the evaluation of range (including method’s dimensionality, reliability, and validity).

About the study

In the present study, researchers designed plus tested the 23-item ABR awareness scale for the quantitative evaluation of ABR consciousness among HCPs residing in low-income nations and middle-income nations.

The level comprised questionnaires filled out by HHCPs plus AHCPs licensed for prescribing and dispensing antibiotics across six countries, i. e., Nigeria, Ghana, Vietnam, Thailand, Peru, and Tanzania. Individuals were invited via print, mail, or telephonic requests to participate in the study. Invitations were circulated throughout private clinics, hospitals, postgraduate education programs, and professional healthcare bodies.

The forms comprised four modules: demographics, ABR recognition, practice items, and context items. Psychometrical analysis queries in the particular ABR attention scale had been based on the Rasch measurement theory. Bivariate-type analysis was performed to identify ABR awareness-associated factors. The particular questionnaires targeted HHCPs plus AHCPs, recognizing ABR as an One Health issue.

The steps involved in the design and testing associated with the HCP ABR understanding questionnaire included (i) the introduction of a conceptual design (based on literature reviews plus qualitative research); (ii) the development of items simply by mapping to the conceptual design; (iii) translation and back translation based on linguistic and conceptual equivalence; (iv) pre-testing based on items, words, or response scales; (v) field plots; (vi) psychometric analysis of item fit validity, targeting, item dependence, reliability, stability of products and model fit; plus (vii) size recommendations, including use limitations.


A total associated with 941 HCPs (86%, which includes 625 and 316 HHCPs and AHCPs, respectively) across six nations were analyzed. The ABR awareness range had high coefficients to get reliability (0. 9 plus 0. 9 for HHCPs and AHCPs, respectively) but showed better intra-nation performance compared in order to inter-nation overall performance. The median scores pertaining to ABR awareness ranged between 55 among Tanzanian HHCPs and 64 among Peruvian HHCPs and between 55 among Vietnamese AHCPs to 64 meant for Thai AHCPs.

Veterinarians plus physicians showed greater scores compared to other HCPs throughout the nations tested. HCPs documented working with inadequate health care infrastructure, and > 95. 0% of HCPs demonstrated interest within receiving training and/or information on antiseptic stewardship plus antibiotic opposition. The 23 items associated with the ABR scale were included under four domain names of ABR knowledge, i. e., ABR mechanisms, ABU (antibiotic use) as the main factor driving ABR, infection control measures designed for organisms showing antimicrobial resistance, and ABR identification.

Participant responses towards the modules mirrored the difficulty level of the particular conceptual style for AHCPs and HHCPs. The ratings for antibiotic resistance consciousness significantly correlated with the level of training, profession, and practice type just for human HCPs; however, ABR scores were not associated with age or even sex.

For AHCPs, the demographic variables were not associated with the particular ABR scores, except for the practice type among Vietnamese AHCPs, along with those employed in government hospitals displaying significantly greater scores, in comparison in order to HCPs used in private hospitals (66 vs . 58). Over 34% of HHCPs had reportedly attended ABR coaching (31%, 35%, 43%, 25% and 39% in Ghana, Nigeria, Peru, Tanzania, and Vietnam, respectively).

In Vietnam and Peru, HCPs who were provided lessons on ABR in their curriculum showed significantly greater ABR awareness ratings for AHCPs and HHCPs, respectively, compared to HCPs who had been not taught about ABR. Among AHCPs, fewer Peruvian HCPs (25. 0%) received particular ABR in comparison to Thai AHCPs (78. 0%) or Vietnamese AHCPs (55. 0%). Factual context-related factors such as the particular presence or even absence of particular resources, the presence associated with other diseases, or receiving information provided reliable findings.

Across most nations, HHCPs and AHCPs documented that they prescribed antibiotics since they feared poor outcomes of diseases and had greater sanitation and hygiene concerns than antimicrobial level of resistance concerns. Chronic infections such as tuberculosis , human immunodeficiency virus infections, malaria, plus accidents and trauma were considered more important by HHCPs in Africa. Among animal HCPs, > 50% experienced more concerns about chronic illnesses within Thailand, Vietnam, and Peru.

Nearly 67% of the particular HCPs reported that ABR information received was inadequate for informing regular exercise. In the majority of settings, HCPs documented that ABR monitoring was not performed at their workplaces, with the exception associated with Thai AHCPs. The HHCPs and AHCPs receiving samples from medical healthcare representatives showed higher ABR recognition in comparison to some other HCPs.

The particular study results showed that will HCPs’ awareness of ABR could be reliably assessed with the particular validated ABR scale across the countries tested. Using the ABR scale with framework questions plus objective dimension of practices could inform healthcare interventions for improved antibiotic usage.

Journal reference:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *