Health and travel: How might traveling benefit health? – Medical News Today

happy older person backpacking on hiking trail Share on Pinterest
People who are able to travel away from their local area report being in better health than those who are not, a new study suggests. Image credit: Rob and Julia Campbell/Stocksy.

  • According to a new survey-based research on a population from the United Kingdom, constraints on travel outside of one’s local area are usually associated with poorer self-reported health.
  • In contrast, people who travel away from their home location report experiencing much better health.
  • One reason might be that when a person is unable to travel, they also have fewer social interactions, which may contribute in order to loneliness.
  • The study focuses on the North of England, an region with poorer health outcomes than the rest of Britain, and limited transportation services outside associated with large urban areas.

A new, survey-based study conducted by researchers at University College London’s Centre for Transport Studies, in the United Kingdom, shows how people feel that travel — and barriers to journey — impact their wellness.

The particular study finds that people who face constraints on their ability to travel outside their local area, or to as many places as they would like, statement poorer health, whereas those who are able in order to travel aside from house believe that they experience better health.

Its findings appear in the Journal of Transportation & Health .

The researchers received funding from your U. K. transport body Transport for the Northern for their research.

The study defined traveling outdoors one’s nearby area as traveling 15 miles, or 24 kilometers, away from home.

The study authors analyzed responses through 2, 747 residents from the North of England regarding their own health and the restrictions to travel that they encounter.

This area of England has the nation’s worst health results, according to the experts, and many of its areas lack adequate transportation facilities.

The survey respondents were asked in order to report their particular level of agreement or disagreement with five questions, each of which focused upon a specific traveling constraint:

  • “I vacation beyond my neighborhood less often than I would ideally like to” — the travel frequency constraint
  • “I travel to fewer places (e. g., cities or towns outside the local area) than I would preferably like to” — a constraint on the number of places traveled
  • “I take a trip to locations that are nearer compared to the ones I might ideally like to go” — the travel distance constraint
  • “I travel simply by public transportation to areas I would certainly ideally such as to go by car” — a travel-by-car constraint
  • “I travel by car to places I might ideally like to go simply by public transport” — a constraint on access to public transportation.

Based on the survey responses, the authors concluded that will individuals who were able to travel at least 15 miles away from home, plus who were capable to journey frequently and see more places were more likely to report much better health.

The associations between traveling and state of health were more significant in respondents aged 55 years and over.

According in order to lead author Dr . Paulo Anciaes , previous research has established that the particular capability to vacation can increase entry to employment and educational opportunities. He hoped to investigate, for the first time, the effect of take a trip on wellness.

He told Medical News Today that the Northern of England was chosen as the part of research because it lags behind the particular rest associated with the country. “The government has, as one of its main priorities, the ‘ leveling up ‘ of the particular North and other lagging regions, ” he said.

“The health outcomes are usually consistently worse [in the North] than in the South, ” Doctor Anciaes noted, “and statistics and studies suggest that this is mainly explained by the lower incomes. Our study tried to uncover other possible reasons. We found that the ability to travel is one of them. ”

To assess the effect associated with travel on health, Dr. Anciaes and his co-author, Dr. Paul Metcalfe , employed a technique called “path analysis” that will made it possible for them to observe the direct plus indirect effects of one variable on another.

The researchers discovered that when people were limited in the number of places they could go, the particular lack of opportunities for social interaction was directly linked to poorer health.

On the other hand, constrained travel frequency negatively affected health less directly. That is, he said, “travel constraints are significantly related to social participation, and social participation is then significantly related to self-reported health. ”

Traveling outside one’s local area can also have a direct effect on health quality, in that it may allow people to access more, and perhaps better, healthcare options than might be available closer to home.

Lifestyle medical educator Dr. Elizabeth Pegg Frates , who was not involved in the study, told MNT :

“It is clear that interpersonal connection will be a basic human need. After our need with regard to water, food, and shelter, we have a need for belonging, or social connection. ”

Dr. Frates said there is ample research describing the effect a lack of social connectedness can have on wellness: “ Research from 1979 demonstrated that the people who lacked social plus community ties were the particular most likely to die in a nine-year prospective study. With lack associated with social interaction often comes loneliness. ”

“Loneliness has been reported to be associated with heart attacks, cancer, delayed malignancy recovery, progression of heart disease, high blood pressure, and slower wound healing, ” she pointed out. “Also, a recent study indicates that will loneliness may be associated with the development of type 2 diabetes. ”

Dr . Frates has co-authored an article for the American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine describing the positive benefits of interpersonal connections upon health.

“The study shows, ” said Doctor Anciaes, “that the possibility to travel is important for the health of populations. The implication is that constraints to travel require to be removed. ”

He cited as such restrictions an insufficient level associated with transport services, particularly in rural areas, and the absence of solutions beyond the particular peak travel hours of the day, or on weekends plus during school holidays.

The cost of transportation can also be an issue, as is the lack of personal security, crowded facilities, and poor accessibility regarding older and disabled passengers.

For people who would like in order to be able to journey more simply by car but are inhibited by the costs of owning and using one, Dr . Anciaes suggested that relevant authorities could provide “subsidies to poorer households using a private car whenever they live in areas with no public transport. ”

Doctor Anciaes noted that improving public transportation would also make car driving easier by reducing the quantity of vehicles on the road.

Dr. Patricia L. Mokhtarian of the particular School associated with Civil plus Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech was not active in the study, but endorsed the importance of travel, telling MNT within no uncertain terms that will, “[f]undamentally, travel is essential to health and well-being — if we aren’t moving, we are usually dead. ”

She admitted, however, that promoting travel “presents something of a policy/ planning dilemma, ” considering the resulting increased environmental burden when more people traveling more.

Nonetheless, said Dr. Mokhtarian, “[t]he wellbeing benefits are manifold. There’s [a] sizable literature on the latter, including much associated with my own work . ”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *